|
NEWS
| NOVEMBER 2, 2005
Plus Minus Grading System
Grading system report analyzed
The task force’s report
lists advantages, disadvantages and is available online.
 |
| The Shorthorn: Scott Russell |
| Student Congress Vice President
Zac Sanders, left, presents a petition signed
by more than 2,500 students at the Undergraduate Assembly
meeting on Tuesday. The petition was signed by students
who oppose the proposed Plus Minus grading system. |
|
By Elaine
Marsilio
The Shorthorn staff
Administrators, faculty and students discussed Tuesday the UTA task
force’s report, which presented the advantages and disadvantages
of a Plus Minus grading system.
The report is available on the Office of the Provost’s Web
site.
“This gives us an opportunity to continue now that all have
had the opportunity to view the report,” Provost Dana Dunn
said.
Student Congress President Josh Sawyer and SC Vice President Zac
Sanders presented their views on the system and answered faculty
questions.
Science Dean Paul Paulus said students and faculty in his college
were concerned about increased hassles and complaints.
But some in the college think the system would increase precision
in grading, and some also wondered why a majority of other Texas
universities don’t use it, he said.
Management associate professor Gary McMahan, a member of the task
force appointed by Dunn, said at the meeting that university faculty
and administrators should consider how the university community
wants to be viewed if the grading system were used here.
 |
| The Shorthorn: Manikandan Sachidanandan |
| Business junior Earle Thompson
makes a comment during the Undergraduate Assembly
meeting on Tuesday. The meeting was held to discuss the
Plus Minus grading system, and members of Student Congress
presented their petition. |
|
McMahan said UTA is not among the almost
80 percent of Carnegie research institutions using the system and
that the implementation here would be similar to “follow the
leader.”
“That is really a key point to think through — who we
are, how we define ourselves, and how we evaluate our students,
and how we reward our students,” he said. “I want to
be able to show there is a difference between my 83 students and
my 89 students.”
Dunn said research has shown that overall grade inflation would
not exist with the system, but instead it would be on an individual
student basis where half the GPAs would go up and half would go
down.
Honors College Dean Robert McMahon said students worried about their
GPAs should know that employers look at a graduate’s campus
involvement as well as other factors in addition to one’s
GPA. If the system were implemented, the average student should
not have any trouble, he said.
“We are talking about very minute changes for students,”
he said.
Associate Provost Michael Moore said all faculty will be questioned
about implementing a Plus Minus grading system here through paper
or online surveys in the coming weeks.
“The next thing we are sure about is that we will be talking
to the faculty via some sort of poll or opportunity to gain feedback,”
Moore said after the meeting.
He said there is no clear process of which governing body would
make recommendations to President James Spaniolo. He added that
the Undergraduate and Graduate assemblies would most likely be asked
to comment on their views of implementing a Plus Minus grading system.
Dunn and Spaniolo will then discuss the accumulated feedback and
make a decision.
CLARIFICATION
Thiss story should have stated that the Plus Minus
grading system was discussed at the Undergraduate Assembly meeting
and that no vote was taken.
|
THE SHORTHORN ASKED:
What was your general reaction to how the Undergraduate
Assembly meeting went, and how do you feel about the
meeting as a whole?
|
|
|
|
| Jesse
Enderle, music junior
“My question is, if everyone shows up for a vote,
will faculty take us into account or will they still
proceed with what they think is best for us?”
|
|
| |
| Sheila
Haddad, biology sophomore
“I think there were a lot of good issues [presented].
Students were offered ample opportunities to offer their
concerns.”
Jesse Enderle, music junior |
|
| |
| Allen
Medway, biology junior
“I think [the discussion] is good for the university,
period. Like it was pointed out in there, the students
don’t participate this much in anything.” |
|
|