The Shorthorn UT-Arlington  

Page One Opinion Editor: Jessica Smith
817-272-3661

News
Sports
Arts
Opinion
Archives
About Us
Advertising
Calendar
Contact
Contact
Corrections
Employment
Search
Staff Box
Subscribe

 

OPINION | february 13, 2004

Letter

Getting back to love’s basics

My daughters and I once watched an especially heart-wrenching episode of “Little House on the Prairie.” Mary is stricken with brain fever, the family moves to Mankato to be near her, Ma works in the laundry and Pa works on the railroad. Laura, angry that the family has been torn away from the farm, prays that Mary will die. Mary almost does, but survives. Laura is racked by remorse and the family must sell the farm to keep Mary alive. Of course, everything turns out okay and Mary survives. Ma quits her job and Pa comes back from the railroad. Family friends buy the farm just to sell it back to the Ingalls.  

The end music plays, and little girls bob through wildflowers. The only sound in the room is sniffling. Brimming with melodrama, I turn to my youngest and say, “Haven, I’d work on the railroad for you.” Then I pause, swipe a few fake tears, and muster, “Ezrie, I’d iron for twelve hours a day in a Chinese laundry for you.” Finally, gripping 11- year-old Savannah’s shoulders, I sob, “Nana, well Nana, I’d sell the farm for you.”  

Tears roll down cheeks; heads fly back in hysterical laughter. The solemn scene deteriorates into four giggling girls rolling on the floor. This has been our ongoing joke, and when things get rough, inevitably, one of us turns to the other and says, “Why, you know, I’d sell the farm for you.”  

That makes me think about the ways we share our love.  

As newlyweds, my husband and I quickly became frustrated with the reflexive, “I love you too.” We devised an interactive rhyme, which he will probably deny, and kill me for sharing, but here it is. 

P1: “I love you”

P2: “I love you too.”

P1: “I love you more.”

P2: “I love you three.”

P1: “I love you four.” 

Now, that’s a little embarrassing. It’s not like we shouted this from the mountain tops, but for me, it has more significance. Every time we say it, my husband invariably stumbles over a line, I correct him, and we both laugh. These days, we all walk into grocery stores and stop. Our eyes need a second to adjust to the post-Christmas flood of red and pink. We all slip on the spill of cartoon valentines, push past teddy bears to find the pack of gum, and bat the tired aluminum heart that pings us in the head. Everyone feels assaulted by love’s commercial expression. No one seems to be laughing.  

This Valentine’s Day, we should trust our instincts. Go traditional. Rather than buying roses, candy and bits of fluff, think back and find ways to personalize the day. Use pet names and play silly games with your kids, with your spouse or with your significant other. Part of the wonder of love is that it makes us feel special. Rather than relying on fabricated messages and generic gestures of sentiment, take a moment to reminisce. Get creative. Get back to the basics of love.

—Teresa Megahan is a 2000 alumna.

 

TopTop of Page

SECTIONS: home | news | sports | scene | opinion | archive | search


The Shorthorn Online

The University of Texas at Arlington | Department of Student Publications
© Copyright 2001.
All Rights Reserved. Corrections | Webmaster