The Shorthorn UT-Arlington  

Page One
News Editor: Jessica Freeman
817-272-3661

News
Sports
Arts
Opinion
Archives
About Us
Advertising
Calendar
Contact
Contact
Corrections
Employment
Search
Staff Box
Subscribe

NEWS | October 14, 2004

Elections
Debate focuses on domestic issues
Undecided voters weigh how this last debate will affect the way they vote.

By Robert Kleeman
Contributor to The Shorthorn

President Bush and Sen. Kerry debated domestic policy issues at the final presidential debate Wednesday. Some undecided students said the debate has influenced how they will vote.

The event, held at the University of Arizona, was moderated by CBS News anchor Bob Schieffer and covered issues including same-sex unions, abortion, the economy, health care, education and affirmative action. Shakera Crawley, broadcast news junior, said she votes independently primarily because party affiliation would tie her hands too tightly. An undecided voter, Crawley said the debate swayed her original push for Bush toward Kerry. The debate proved Kerry has a more sound approach toward the security of the nation, she said.

“Labels are less important in America,” Crawley said. “I vote for the lesser of the two evils. Tonight’s debate answered my questions, which will help me in deciding who I want to vote for.”

Bush continued his assault on Kerry’s voting record, saying his senate votes contradicted the rhetoric behind his proposed policies.

“There is a mainstream in politics,” he said. “He [Kerry] is on the far left side of the stream. He voted 98 times in the senate to increase taxes and yet he wants you to believe that he supports tax cuts for the middle class.”

Kerry is a tax-and-spend liberal unaware of the economic costs of his wishy-washy policies, Bush said. Kerry’s preaching about fiscal responsibility when his proposed actions would lead this country back into a recession, he said.

Kerry restated his position that Bush is the only president in 72 years to lose jobs. Because of the current president, too many Americans are without quality health care, job losses are being subsidized by outsourcing, and the recent tax cut gave the country’s top 1 percent 89 billion dollars that could have gone to the middle class or to properly fund No Child Left Behind, Bush’s education reform act, Kerry said.

“This president lecturing to me about fiscal responsibility is like Tony Soprano telling me about law and order,” Kerry said. “I blame the president for what he could have done. The president has turned his back on the wellness of America.”

College Republicans President Kat Miller said Bush stumbled a bit but brushed off the bruises and stayed on his course.

“Bush hesitates when he discusses the war in Iraq,” she said. “I think there is a lot of classified information that he wishes he could tell us, but he knows that in order to protect our security, he can’t. Other than that, he did very well.”

Miller said she was disappointed in the lack of new information provided by the candidates. Affirmative action, gay marriage and faith were the only topics that did not provoke recycled answers, she said. It was a very risky political move for Kerry to bring up the sexuality of Vice President Cheney’s daughter, she said.

University Democrats President Carl Blair said trickle-down economic policies, which Bush supports, have been proven ineffective in capitalist societies. Economic organizations have stated the recession started March 21, two months after Bush took office, he said.

History senior Brett Cervantes is pro-Bush but said he would like to see the conservative party move away from the moderate views of the center. Live television debates only reinforce his viewpoints, he said.

Television debates allow the voters to connect with the candidates, sociology senior Nichole Conwill said.

Conwill is a Nader supporter who will choose her vote based on the projected results. If the race appears to be close, she said she would vote for Kerry. Wednesday’s debate was dominated by Kerry, who showed he is prepared to lead the nation as commander in chief, she said.

Political science senior Grady Hill III who is very concerned with the economy and the war in Iraq, said the debate did not make his decision any easier.

“Both parties have issues that I do or don’t support,” he said. “I am undecided because I support the candidate, not the party. I feel clearer about the candidates’ positions but the debate didn’t tell me anything I didn’t already know about the candidates.”

 

TopTop of Page

SECTIONS: home | news | sports | scene | opinion | archive | search


The Shorthorn Online

The University of Texas at Arlington | Department of Student Publications
© Copyright 2001.
All Rights Reserved. Corrections | Webmaster