The Shorthorn UT-Arlington  

Page One News Editor:Chris Piper
817-272-3661

News
Sports
Arts
Archives
About Us
Advertising
Calendar
Contact
Contact
Corrections
Employment
Search
Staff Box
Subscribe

 

NEWS | JAN. 24

Architecture
Lawsuit answer due by Feb. 3
Former dean Martha LaGess’ suit claims that before confronting her, some faculty had plans to fill her position with an interim.

By Brad Rollins
Contribution to The Shorthorn

The Texas attorney general’s office has until Feb. 3 to respond to former Architecture Dean Martha LaGess’ gender discrimination lawsuit. The state’s top lawyer will represent the university and the UT System, both defendants in the Tarrant County district court civil case.

“We are obligated by law to give the case to the attorney general for representation,” said UT System attorney Helen Bright. “At this time, we are not in a position to provide you with any further comment.”

A spokesman for Attorney General Greg Abbott confirmed his office had been forwarded the claim. He said he would have no comment until after the state’s official answer is filed.

LaGess’ lawsuit maintains the administrative decision to fire her as dean was influenced by some of the school’s tenured faculty based on her refusal to submit to what she calls “discriminatory values.” In addition to reinstatement as dean, LaGess is seeking unspecified monetary damages.

The suit claims that prior to and during her tenure the school’s atmosphere was rife with bias against women.

“UTA’s policy regarding sexual misconduct is stated on posters throughout the university,” the complaint reads. “However, such policy is not rigorously enforced.”

The suit further alleges Provost George Wright told LaGess she would have to overcome “the good ole’ boys you inherited” and that one professor told her, “You are our diversity.”

Nearly a dozen administrators and faculty mentioned in the suit either declined to comment or did not respond to calls or e-mails.

University President Robert Witt did not respond to a phone call and e-mail request for an interview. Dr. Wright referred questions to Bright.

“Attorneys are equipped with knowing what issues should be played out in the press or not discussed until the court case is underway,” Wright wrote in an e-mail.

LaGess claims Dr. Witt told her two and a half weeks before she was fired that she was one of the best hires of the year.

According to the suit, Witt called LaGess offering advice for a meeting scheduled four hours later with six architecture faculty who had requested a sit-down with the school’s leader. Witt advised LaGess, the suit says, to say as little as possible in the meeting and listen to faculty concerns.

The suit also states the president expressed support for the dean in the same conversation, telling her, “We believe in you. We believe you’re one of the best hires we’ve made all year. I’m just sorry we didn’t tell you what the job was.”

Before the month was over, LaGess was fired.

But according to her attorney’s claims, the former dean had already lost her job by Aug. 2. The plaintiff maintains the university had discussed an interim dean even before the meeting with faculty, one of whom had already sought LaGess’ termination in a letter to Witt. Former UT-Austin Associate Dean Richard Dodge had been contacted about replacing LaGess, the suit said.

“What Martha LaGess did not know at the time was that the decision to remove her as dean had already been made prior to the time she had to confront her accusers,” LaGess’ attorney writes in the complaint.

Documents obtained by The Shorthorn indicate LaGess’ faculty detractors cite what they saw as gross incompetence in questioning her administration.

“Like most of the architecture faculty and others on this campus, I welcomed the vision and optimistic enthusiasm anticipated with the appointment of Dean LaGess,” professor Richard Ferrier wrote to Witt in a July 17 letter calling for her removal. “Her ‘leadership’ has not provided new direction or innovation. It has resulted in a seemingly endless series of disasters and devastating events.”

The five-page document complained the dean had a “predetermined attitude that older faculty members are not capable of contemporary computer use and application” and that she arrogantly dismissed concerns about her leadership.

“In record time, Dean LaGess has alienated most of the ... School of Architecture,” the letter read. “She has done the same with alumni, professional associates and colleges at other institutions. She does not exhibit any degree of respect for the accomplishments of this faculty, our students or alumni.”

The relationship between LaGess and her faculty critics continued to sour over the 11 months of her deanship, the letter said, due to her ineptitude in conducting the school’s affairs.

Now a tenured associate professor, LaGess is represented by Ted Anderson of the Kilgore & Kilgore PLLC firm in Dallas. She was fired as dean Aug. 20 after ignoring an Aug. 16 request for her resignation from Wright, who then locked her out of the dean’s suite.

Dodge was named interim dean Sept. 4.

 

 

TopTop of Page

SECTIONS: home | news | sports | scene | opinion | archive | search


The Shorthorn Online

The University of Texas at Arlington | Department of Student Publications
© Copyright 2001.
All Rights Reserved. Corrections | Webmaster