|
NEWS
| November 11, 2003
Tuition and Fees
Add/drop fee spurs SC debate
Some senators say it may be needed
but is not justifiable with other expected hikes.
By Chris
Baggott
The Shorthorn staff
Some student leaders oppose the proposed $2-per-credit-hour add/drop
fee administrators say will halt “abuses of the system.”
Rusty Ward, the interim vice president for business affairs and
controller, said too many scheduling alterations cause major problems
for the university. The fee, which administrators first presented
at a Student Congress meeting Nov. 4, however, is the subject of
debate.
Ward said there is a need to stop students from adding and dropping
courses without some kind of penalty.
“There’s a number of people we have identified who play
games with the system,” he said. “There are a whole
lot of ways they can get around the rules.”
Ward said about 50 percent of students make changes to their schedules
after the census date. On average, two or three people drop from
each course section, he said. The add/drop fee is a way to cut this
number down, he said.
“It’ll help some,” Ward said. “We’ll
also take the money we get out of this and put it right back in
registration services.”
The Fee Oversight Committee met Monday to discuss this and other
proposed new fees and changes to existing ones. Kent Gardner, vice
president for student affairs, said this was the second of three
committee meetings. The final meeting is Dec. 1, after which the
committee will submit its recommendations to interim President Charles
Sorber.
The committee discussed a number of fees ranging from a $3-per-credit-hour
fee for English 1301 to the library fee increase of $3 per credit
hour to $15 per credit hour. The English 1301 fee would pay for
classroom materials, such as handouts, Scantrons and paper. The
library service fee would go toward purchasing new books and supporting
library services, such as Sam’s Click Café and electronic
databases.
Dr. Sorber included the library service and computer and information
technology fee hikes in his final recommendation for tuition increases
to the UT System last week.
SC President Josh Warren, a member of the committee, said members
didn’t seem to oppose those ideas.
“I don’t know for sure what the committee will do,”
he said. “But nobody seemed to have concerns over those two
fees.”
Gardner said most of the proposed fees had already been reviewed.
He said any course-specific increase affecting a specific student
population must be reviewed by that college’s constituency
council. Any increase affecting the student body must go through
congress.
“The purpose of the committee is to have input from the students,”
Gardner said. “Most of the fees were well discussed by their
[constituency councils].”
Warren said he is particularly concerned about the add/drop fee.
He said the reasoning for the fee is valid but doesn’t think
all students should pay for the actions of some.
Engineering Senator Dennis Gjoni said he doesn’t see the need
for the add/drop fee. He said he thinks it’s just a way to
make up for funds cut from the administration’s original tuition
proposal. Sorber cut more than a third from the administrative-backed
proposal when he made his recommendation to the UT System.
“Yes, it is needed to prevent people from cheating the system,”
Gjoni said. “But it’s not justified at this time.”
He said Ward spoke to congress last week about the add/drop fee.
Gjoni said senators learned students were registering for multiple
classes and holding spaces for their friends. Once the semester
starts, they drop the course so their friends can register for it.
Warren said his main concern was the fee might hurt students who
are not trying to cheat the system.
“It does seem like this fee is going to negatively impact
students who are innocent bystanders,” he said. “I really
don’t think those students should be penalized.”
Liberal Arts Senator Reagan Holmes said he understands the need
for the fee. He said the university needs the funding and there
isn’t really any way to get it.
“I know that UTA is a growing university, and we need money
to support everything,” he said. “Money doesn’t
grow on trees.”
|
Tuition Deregulation Data Bank
For more information about tuition deregulation,
visit the Data
Bank.
|
|
|
|
| Kent
Gardner, vice president for student affairs,
says most constituency councils have already discussed
major-specific fees.
|
|
|