The Shorthorn UT-Arlington  

Page One
News Editor:Amber Tafoya
817-272-3661

News
Sports
Arts
Opinion
Archives
About Us
Advertising
Calendar
Contact
Contact
Corrections
Employment
Search
Staff Box
Subscribe

NEWS | November 5, 2003

Tuition and Fees
Proposal: $10-per credit hour spring increase
The final tuition proposal includes raising the rates as well as two student fees.

By Chris Baggott
The Shorthorn staff

Officials say the final tuition increase proposal will cost students less than anticipated, although there will be additional budget cuts to make up the difference.

The university’s final proposal, influenced by suggestions from the administration and Tuition Review Committee, has tuition increasing $10 per credit hour in the spring and an additional $17 per credit hour next fall. A pilot program in the plan will also increase tuition $10 per credit hour for upper-level engineering and upper- and graduate level nursing courses. Graduate-level engineering courses will increase $20 per credit hour.

Interim President Charles Sorber submitted his recommendation Monday to the UT System. Dr. Sorber’s recommendation includes a $3-per-credit-hour increase in the computing and information technology fee and a $2-per-credit-hour increase in the Library fee.

Along with the increases, the plan calls for a $3-per-credit-hour refund for students who pay in full by the due date. Both programs will be initiated in fall 2004.

The proposal comes to about $1 more than the committee recommended, but the refund for prompt payment should allow many students to get back part of their tuition, Sorber said.

“If a student pays his tuition on time, he’ll only pay the $1 more, but, with the discount, he’ll come in cheaper than the Tuition Review Committee recommended,” he said.

Originally, administrators recommended an increase of $15 per credit hour in the spring and an additional $20 per credit hour in the fall. The Tuition Review Committee recommended an increase of $8 per credit hour in the spring and the same in the fall. It also recommended a new student operations fee members say would have accounted for the majority of the university’s needs.

John Hall, interim vice president for administration and campus operations, said the main problem with decreasing the administration’s original proposal is the budget cuts that follow. The university’s Physical Plant budget was cut by about $1.5 million. This means that many projects, such as roofing and replacing electrical wiring in some buildings, must be pushed back, he said.

“They took the biggest hit,” Sorber said. “But that’s where we felt we could do it and maintain the academic atmosphere of the university.”

Hall said the university can’t afford to ignore the need for maintenance forever.

“We are having to do more with less,” he said. “It’s a difficult position to maintain.”

Sorber said his proposal was geared more toward students than facilities. It focuses more on tuition than fees because the university needs to generate more financial aid money. He said the Office of General Council told him the university didn’t have the authority to create the new fee without legislative approval.

A portion of revenue generated by the increases is set aside for financial aid: 20 percent at the undergraduate level and 15 percent at the graduate level. These numbers were set by the Legislature during its third special session. Five percent of undergraduate set-asides will be sent to Austin for the Texas B-On-Time loan program.

The set-asides include a new program to provide grants for part-time students to help them absorb the increases, Sorber said.

“We’ve never done much for part-time students in financial aid,” he said. “It’s really important to work with these students.”

Financial Aid Director Karen Krause said grants for part-time students will be available in fall 2004.

Krause said financial aid recipients will have their awards automatically adjusted to help pay for the increase. The fee increases mean there may not be as much money available, she said.

“I think it will be enough to be reasonable,” she said. “We should still be able to help a significant number of students.”

Sorber said the program to increase tuition for upper- and graduate-level engineering and nursing courses makes students who benefit from those degree plans pay for them. Those degree programs cost more in equipment and manpower, Sorber said, and increasing their cost should offset the cost of the programs.

The program is called a pilot program because the university plans to see if changes need to be made as time goes on, he said. The plan is to increase upper-level tuition once and then continue at the new level; there will not be a subsequent increase, Sorber said.

The increases will provide needed funding, but cutting costs is still a priority, Hall said. He said the different cost-saving procedures would lead to “very significant dollars” coming back into the university. The money generated will be used mainly to finance the university’s debt capacity, which determines how much money the university can borrow to maintain the campus facilities and build more, he said.

“We’re well within our debt capacity for the debt that is currently outstanding,” he said. “To expand the campus we require additional debt capacity.”

From there to here

A look at the three suggestions for increasing tuition.

Final recommendation:

• $10-per-credit-hour increase in the spring

• Additional $17-per-credit-hour increase in the fall

• $10-per-credit-hour increase for upper-level engineering and nursing courses and for graduate-level nursing courses.

• $20-per-credit-hour increase for graduate-level engineering courses.

• $3-per-credit-hour increase in the computing and information technology fee in the fall.

• $2-per-credit-hour increase in the library fee in the fall.

Original administration recommendation:

• $15-per-credit-hour increase in the spring.

• Additional $20-per-credit-hour increase in the fall.

• $10-per-credit-hour increase for upper-level engineering and nursing courses.

• $15-per-credit-hour increase for graduate-level engineering courses.

Tuition Review Committee recommendation:

• $8-per-credit-hour increase in the spring.

• Additional $8-per-credit-hour increase in the fall.

• $10-per-credit-hour increase for upper-level engineering and nursing courses.

• $15-per-credit-hour increase for graduate-level engineering courses.

• $3-per-credit-hour increase in the computing and information technology fee in the spring.

• Creation of a Student Operations Fee set at $12 per credit hour in the spring.

Tuition Deregulation Data Bank

For more information about tuition deregulation, visit the Data Bank.

Sorber's Tution Proposal

Charles Sorber, interim president, says he tried to keep student interest in mind while preparing the proposal.

 


TopTop of Page

SECTIONS: home | news | sports | scene | opinion | archive | search


The Shorthorn Online

The University of Texas at Arlington | Department of Student Publications
© Copyright 2001.
All Rights Reserved. Corrections | Webmaster